Friday, November 14, 2008

Recording "Blue of a Kind"

I've taken Blue of a Kind into the studio to make our first CD. We've had 2 sessions so far at Chillhouse Studios. It's a marvelous experience working in the studio, one you'll never forget. Working with Eric at Chillhouse is really good because he's got such a great ear. He can mike the group in a way that you can analyze problems and make corrections, and he knows when a take basically works. With a couple of active ribbon mikes at hand, some great condensers and the iso booth, you can really rock.

What have we found out in the process? More than we want to know. We can sing in front of an audience, totally knock them out and give a full hour's entertainment before we wilt, but underneath there are guys improvising, slugging along and basically having a good time but they aren't drinking the same Koolaide the rest of us are. They are showing up for the big game with their shoes untied.

I stacked up songs for the first session that I thought we could nail pretty easily. The first session was quite successful. For the second session, I mixed comfort with some stretch, since I thought the guys would be better adjusted and would show "up ready to play", so we could cut some butter.

Let me say this: we're a medium-sized ensemble. There's room to hide.

It turns out maybe one sixth or one eighth of the group doesn't know their stuff, and now they are getting caught by their fellow singers. What seems to work in concert isn't cutting it when the harsher light of the studio is shone upon them. I'm not talking about the occasional flub - some guys are on a map all their own.

They fall into 2 basic categories. First, the guy has basically learned everything but is occasionally singing a line that is interesting but "off book". Maybe it's one individual in one song and another guy in another song. It might pull off the other singers, depending on the complexity of the song and whether they are near enough to hear. It creates muddiness and noise, but it isn't a total mess because it's so sporadic.

Second category: the guy just has not learned his stuff and is singing pretty much whatever comes to mind, being pushed and pulled freely by whatever else is going on around him, touching here and there on the vocal line he is supposed to present.

The first category is more correctable, and probably does less overall harm since the deviations are musical, creative and episodic. The second category is just like the plague and sucks life out of every performance. It creates an undercurrent of noise that permeates every piece. You can't put a finger on it; it's just always there muddying things up, taking the edge off every effect the arranger intended or what the director is going for. Combine the two, and a very small fraction of the group is heading you directly towards your next "train wreck".

What to do? We're a volunteer group, a bunch of guys who do this for fun. So I repeat, what to do? We are achieving our goals in the field and we want to make a CD to sell that represents us at our finest. So?

It's tough. I have decided to serve everyone notice. They have 7 days to polish 4-5 pieces they should already know by rote. Come the next session, if their compadres don't think they have a song down pretty much solid on the first take, they will ask them to stand down and try on the next song. Maybe sitting in the control room with their songbook open will help. It's ugly, but it might work. Last week we recorded 5 songs and produced maybe two keepers. The glass may be almost half full, but it's no good. Next week, we have to do better. The guys have to show up "mentally hot".

Look forward to a really great CD from these guys. I know they have it in them and Eric will definitely help us bring it out.

Bob

No comments: